Talk:Status Roles

Big and little do not imply power relationships. There are submissive bigs, dominant littles, and ageplayers who prefer not to play with power at all.

In what way does "switch" imply a neutral status? This page enforces a false binary.

All statuses are neutral statuses.

Different person than the above. Could we possibly narrow the scope of this website to only statuses that people should take seriously? Like "nazi officer" could be a status but that doesn't belong on a website that purports to show truth. Let's get rid of the immature clutter. 87.106.143.252

Categorizaton of "status roles"

First off, "status role" doesn't make any sense. These are roles. And use a category for that. Create Category:Roles.

Second off, as the above poster wrote, an arbitrary categorization is being imposed by structuring the roles as they are. In fact, "D-type" and "s-type" are fairly meaningless descriptions; but if they are real at all, then a given role can fall into several of these buckets. So a list like this makes no sensem organizationally speaking. -- Wulfrath