|
|
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | "The concept of best practices itself is also often considered controversial as the notion itself presents a potential double standard between those that are experienced and those that are not." -- The person who wrote this doesn't seem to know how to use the phrase "double standard". I vote to change it. [[Special:Contributions/87.106.143.252|87.106.143.252]]
| |
| | | | |
| − |
| |
| − | == "Quantifiable" ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Merriam gives "quantifiable" as ''1'' a (1) : to limit by a quantifier (2) : to bind by prefixing a quantifier, b : to make explicit the logical quantity of; ''2'' : to determine, express, or measure the quantity of. Tl;dr the author of this page isn't using the word correctly. I've proposed an edit. -- Wulfrath
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Best practices versus One True Wayism ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | So, Admin, you go to great lengths to assure the reader that your "best practices" concept are not the one true way, yet you refer to them everywhere in the absolute. So what's the difference between this and OTW -- isn't this just a thinly-veiled attempt to present what you think is the one true way, but give yourself plausible deniability? -- Wulfrath 07:48, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
| |